Talk:Kryptonite Kid
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I would like to move the link to the Kryptonite Man up to the section discussing the Kid's return as an adult, and slightly change around the paragraph mentioning the second K Man.--[[User:Manomight1974|Manomight1974]] 3 October 2008, 12:16 AM (EST) | I would like to move the link to the Kryptonite Man up to the section discussing the Kid's return as an adult, and slightly change around the paragraph mentioning the second K Man.--[[User:Manomight1974|Manomight1974]] 3 October 2008, 12:16 AM (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can't see any reason, the first paragraphs discuss one character, the last discussed another. Standard format.There is no reaosn to relentlesly edit over and over, in fact it's GOOD when only a few entries are done at a time (using the "preview" function so that one entry is not entered 8 times in a row) so that other users can look them over before they are forced off the "recent changes" list. --[[User:MatterEaterLad|MatterEaterLad]] 04:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:29, 2 October 2008
The reference to the second Kryptonite Man is not necessary to this entry. Neither being ever encountered each other, and the link to the Kryptonite Man (referring to S No. 299), will bring a reader to any info regarding the second version.--Manomight1974 2 October 2008, 11:45 PM (EST)
It is the same type of referal as entries for The Curator, and many other entries. I think you might have to trust the formmat, I've been around for a long time. --MatterEaterLad 03:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it is somewhat different that The Curator. The Curator is another identity adopted by Humpty Dumpty, not a second person running around using that identity. I really think we should only make reference to one version of the Kryptonite Man here, with the link bringing readers to the entry for the Kryptonite Man, and thus the information for the second version.--Manomight1974 2 October 2008, 11:53 PM (EST)
There IS only one entry for Kryptonite Man, the other is a referral, just like Mighty Boy etc. The Curator refererence is to Curator and Apprentice Prime (entirely different characters). I'm not trying to be a hard ass and I welcome new entries, but I KNOW the format and practices of Supermanica. This evening has been very tedious for me, none of my changes were altering any real content, they were all for format (including having to change tense on a new entry yet again). --MatterEaterLad 03:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think that we need "for example" in the part of the entry that refers to issue 297, as the Kid only made one in-continuity appearance as the Kryptonite Man.--Manomight1974 3 October 2008, 12:08 AM (EST)
That's fine, seems like a good change.--MatterEaterLad 04:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I would like to move the link to the Kryptonite Man up to the section discussing the Kid's return as an adult, and slightly change around the paragraph mentioning the second K Man.--Manomight1974 3 October 2008, 12:16 AM (EST)
I can't see any reason, the first paragraphs discuss one character, the last discussed another. Standard format.There is no reaosn to relentlesly edit over and over, in fact it's GOOD when only a few entries are done at a time (using the "preview" function so that one entry is not entered 8 times in a row) so that other users can look them over before they are forced off the "recent changes" list. --MatterEaterLad 04:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
